Current:Home > StocksA federal appeals court blocks a grant program for Black female entrepreneurs -Elite Financial Minds
A federal appeals court blocks a grant program for Black female entrepreneurs
View
Date:2025-04-28 10:16:48
A legal battle between a program that awards grants to female entrepreneurs of color and a conservative nonprofit organization is expected to raise broader legal questions on the use of diversity programs in corporate America.
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta ruled on Saturday to temporarily block the Fearless Fund from running its Strivers Grant Contest, which awards $20,000 grants to small businesses that are led by at least one woman of color and other requirements.
The panel of judges decided 2-1 that the venture capital fund is "racially discriminatory."
The American Alliance for Equal Rights filed a racial discrimination lawsuit against the program in August, claiming it violates the Reconstruction-era Civil Rights Act of 1866, which prohibits racial discrimination in contracts.
The Fearless Fund argues that the grants are awards and not contracts and are protected by the First Amendment.
The mission of the Fearless Fund is to bridge the gap in venture capital funding for women of color. It says that less than 1 percent of total venture capital funding raised by U.S. companies in 2018 was allocated toward businesses founded by women of color. The program also tries to help grow small businesses started by women of color.
The order pausing the Fearless Fund is another turn in what could be a long legal fight. The temporary injunction reverses a ruling by a U.S. District Court judge last week that denied the Alliance's effort to halt the program.
Conservative activist Edward Blum, founder of the American Alliance for Equal Rights, worked for years to overturn affirmative action policies in colleges and universities. Blum won a major legal victory in June when the Supreme Court effectively ended race-conscious policies in higher education.
In a statement to NPR on Monday, Blum said his organization is pleased by the court's most recent decision and hopeful for a favorable outcome.
"The members of the American Alliance for Equal Rights are gratified that the 11th Circuit has recognized the likelihood that the Fearless Strivers Grant Contest is illegal. We look forward to the final resolution of this lawsuit," Blum said.
Attorney Von Bryant, who represents the interests of venture capitalists, says the Alliance is failing to consider the many disadvantages people of color have experienced for generations in entrepreneurship.
"In the context of historically systemic racism, what the Fearless Fund grant is really trying to do is be a beacon for people who have historically and presently had an uphill battle for funding," Bryant said. "This program is trying to address that."
Bryant says an important question is at stake.
"The plaintiffs in this case are fighting for quote 'equality,' but is that equitable?" he asks.
Bryant also notes that in addition to funding, the Fearless Fund program provides valuable mentorship and networking opportunities that are disparately unavailable to Black female entrepreneurs.
The temporary injunction pauses the grants while a separate panel decides what happens next in the case.
"We strongly disagree with the decision and remain resolute in our mission and commitment to address the unacceptable disparities that exist for Black women and other women of color in the venture capital space," the Fearless Fund said in a statement to the Associated Press.
veryGood! (62927)
Related
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Idaho Murders Case: Judge Enters Not Guilty Plea for Bryan Kohberger
- Here's what really happened during the abortion drug's approval 23 years ago
- Report: Bills' Nyheim Hines out for season with knee injury suffered on jet ski
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Clean Power Startups Aim to Break Monopoly of U.S. Utility Giants
- What Does ’12 Years to Act on Climate Change’ (Now 11 Years) Really Mean?
- NFL record projections 2023: Which teams will lead the way to Super Bowl 58?
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Supreme Court extends freeze on changes to abortion pill access until Friday
Ranking
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- Jonathan Majors' domestic violence trial scheduled for August in New York City
- Energy Forecast Sees Global Emissions Growing, Thwarting Paris Climate Accord
- Eminem's Daughter Hailie Jade Announces Fashionable Career Venture
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Panel at National Press Club Discusses Clean Break
- Court Rejects Pipeline Rubber-Stamp, Orders Climate Impact Review
- Florida county under quarantine after giant African land snail spotted
Recommendation
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
Toddlers and Tiaras' Eden Wood Is All Grown Up Graduating High School As Valedictorian
San Francisco, Oakland Sue Oil Giants Over Climate Change
13 years after bariatric surgery, a 27-year-old says it changed her life
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Wheeler in Wisconsin: Putting a Green Veneer on the Actions of Trump’s EPA
ESPN's Shaka Hislop recovering after collapsing on air before Real Madrid-AC Milan match
New lawsuit provides most detailed account to date of alleged Northwestern football hazing